Jump to:

Disease/ Disorder


Pediatric burns are injuries to the skin or other tissue as a result of exposure to heat (eg, hot liquids [scalds], hot solids [contact burns], smoke [inhalation injury], or direct flames), ultraviolet/infrared radiation, radioactive materials, electricity, friction, chemicals, or cold.1


Burns in the pediatric population have different prevalence, according to ages. From birth to 19.9 years old (2009-2018, US Data)2:

  • Scald injury (49.8%): most common in all children less than 16 years old
  • Fire/flame (22.6%): most common in children between 16 and 20 years old
  • Hot Object Contact (15.8%): decreases with increasing age, highest in children less than 1 year old
  • Electrical (2.0%): increases with increasing age, highest in children between 16 and 20 years old
  • Chemical (1.9%): prevalence varies across ages
  • Radiation (0.2%): very rare in the pediatric population

Epidemiology including risk factors and primary prevention

Burn injuries are considered the fifth most common cause of non-fatal childhood injury worldwide.3 The American Burn Association estimates that 286,000 children and adults with burn injuries require medical attention in the United States.4 About 22.5% of all burns occur in children and youth. 42% of those in children between the ages of 5 to 16 years old. From 2009 to 2018, there was a bimodal distribution of burns across ages with one of the peaks in pediatric patients between the ages of 1 to 15.9. They are the number one cause of non-motor vehicle related deaths in children ages 1 to 4 and the number two cause of death in children ages 4 to 14.5 In children younger than 5 years old, there is an over-representation of burns within minorities. Furthermore, about 10 percent of all hospital admissions of children to burn units are the result of child abuse.6 This suggests a higher incidence of burns in children with disabilities and those from more disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds.7

Worldwide, adult women and children have highest risk for burns.3 In the United States, it was previously thought that burns happened more commonly to males with a 2:1 ratio8. However, according to the World Health Organization, recent data suggests that females now have slightly higher rates compared to men, and attributes this to open fire cooking or unsafe cookstoves.1 In children < 4 years, the ratio of burns in males to females is 2:1. In adolescence, this ratio increases to 4:1.5 There is also a higher incidence in Hispanics and blacks than non-Hispanic whites.9

According to a global study that collected data on the incidence and fatalities from burns in 204 countries and regions from 1990 to 2019, the number of deaths have decreased but the number of new cases has an increasing tendency.10 These data trends suggest that while the management and treatment have likely improved, the risks are more prominent. As such, it is important to educate families and parents with different strategies for burn prevention.

Strategies for Prevention11

  • Scald: keep water heater at a maximum of 120°F; use back burners for cooking on stoves and turn handles toward the back. Nearly 75% of all scalding burns in children are preventable.12
  • Fire/Flame: keep matches and lighters out of reach; exercise proper firework safety.
  • Hot object contact: unplug irons and curling irons when not in use; hot pots and pans should be kept out of reach in the kitchen.
  • Electric: use plug covers that have the same color as outlet; covers that screw in are preferable to single plugs; be mindful of tools and equipment during construction or work around the house.
  • Chemical: keep chemicals out of reach; always tighten and seal containers when not in use.


Burn injuries result in both local and systemic responses. The reactions are due to the direct heat on the skin and microvasculature as well as the chemical mediators of inflammation.

Locally, they affect the tissue with the deeper layers in involved in more severe injuries. Healthy skin consists of epidermal, dermal, and subdermal layers. The epidermis contains keratinocytes, which help maintain water insolubility. The dermis supports the epidermis, contains dermal appendages (hair follicles, sweat and sebaceous glands, nerve endings), and contains collagen that allows skin to withstand stresses.

In thermal injuries, healthy skin is disrupted, leading to water permeability, capillary leakage, and significant fluid loss. With fluid and protein shifts, edema develops. Massive cell destruction leads to shock and a hypermetabolic state, with total body surface area (TBSA) greater than 40%. Given the large surface area to mass ratio, children are also at risk for hypothermia.

In electrical injuries, current is conducted greater in high-water content tissues (blood vessels, nerves, muscles) and generates heat, which is retained in deep tissue and can lead to further injuries (i.e., compartment syndrome). The nervous system is at increased risk due to low resistance of neurons compared to other parts of the body. This can result in significant nerve damage with long term neuropathies and paresthesia. Additionally, entry and exit wounds from electrical injuries can result in significant limb damage and necrosis.

In chemical injuries, the corrosive agents cause coagulation necrosis until completely removed, often leading to deeper injuries.

Systemically, burns cause the release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators that result in systemic responses. There is a loss of intravascular proteins and fluids into the interstitial space due to an increase in capillary permeability, resulting in peripheral vasoconstriction. Myocardial contractility can also be decreased, leading to systemic hypotension and end organ hypoperfusion. Inflammatory mediators can also cause bronchoconstriction, increasing the risk for respiratory distress.

Disease progression including natural history, disease phases or stages, disease trajectory (clinical features and presentation over time)

Depth of burn15

The traditional classifications of first, second, or third-degree burns have been replaced by a nomenclature reflecting the varying need for surgical intervention. According to the American Burn Criteria, burns can be categorized by thickness, and the basis of this burn classification is depth, focusing on four components: appearance, blanching to pressure, pain, and sensation.16 Classifying a burn accurately is important to help guide management and determine outcome.17,18

Upon initial evaluation, it is vital to assess patient’s total body surface area, and which areas have which degrees of injuries (See Physical Exam below for more details). This will assist with management and anticipate needs.

Disease phases and management21

Phase I: Initial assessment and triage

  • Stop the burning process and remove from harm. Complete primary survey including ABCs (airway, breathing, and circulation). Perform secondary survey including estimation of percentage of total body surface area affected and assessment of other injuries. Begin resuscitation.

Phase II: Fluid resuscitation (0-48 hours)

  • Titrate intravenous fluids hourly based on urine output. Resuscitation mediates fluid losses, shock, and potential organ damage. Albumin can be used if needed or may consider other adjuncts such as plasma, high-dose vitamin C, and plasmapheresis.

Phase III: Burn wound coverage

  • Use of topical antimicrobial creams or dressings to prevent infection. Topical antibiotics/creams (i.e., silver sulfadiazine) are used to facilitate healing.
  •  Surgical debridement, burn wound excision and autografting. Early escharotomy helps prevent blood loss and infection. The use of skin substitutes (allografts, xenografts, synthetic grafts) can decrease healing time and pain. A proven strategy to reduce skin grafting requirements for pediatric patients is to administer cool running water in the immediate aftermath of the injury.22
  • Optimize conditions for wound healing, including hemodynamics and nutrition.

Phase IV: Supportive and critical care

  • Prevent and treat infectious complications. Treat hospital complications and provide organ support.
  • Nutritional support.
  • Cardiopulmonary support is weaned as able.

Phase V: Rehabilitation

  • Proper limb positioning to prevent contractures. Aggressive rehabilitation with active range of motion and exercise.
  • Anabolic agents and catabolism-reducing agents may be used. Beta blockers can be used to reverse protein catabolism after severe burns.23
  • Psychosocial support.

Specific secondary or associated conditions and complications

  • Inhalation injury24
  • Anoxic brain injury
  • Fractures
  • Cardiac abnormalities, arrhythmias
  • Hypermetabolism
  • Thermal dysregulation
  • Wound infection and sepsis
  • Low bone mineral density
  • Neuropathies (numbness, weakness, paresthesia, chronic pain) and myelopathy25
  • Heterotopic ossification
  • Skin changes (hypertrophic scarring, keloids, leukoderma, pruritus)26,27
  • Joint contractures
  • Complications associated with burn location (i.e., eyes, mouth, genitalia)

Essentials of Assessment


A thorough history with close attention to injury mechanism, location of injury, and any prior treatments can help guide the treatment plan during initial assessment. Inconsistencies between history and presentation may indicate nonaccidental injury, which may warrant additional investigation and support from Child Abuse specialist and pertinent authorities.28Document developmental history, including current abilities and previous/current therapies or interventions. Review of systems should include the following:

  • Vision and hearing
  • Swallow function
  • Nutritional status
  • Cardiovascular and respiratory limitations to exercise
  • Bowel and bladder function
  • Pain
  • Musculoskeletal limitations (including weight-bearing status and range of motion restrictions)
  • Sensory deficits (particularly following electrical injuries)
  • Mental health status and psychological assessment

Physical examination

On physical examination, the patient needs to be fully assessed for involvement and degree of damage since this will impact appropriateness of resources and management.  Affected Total Body Surface Areas (TBSA) is determined to assist with early fluid resuscitation. A Lund-Browder burn chart is used in younger children for more accurate estimation due to different body surface areas than adults. (See Figure 1) For adolescents, the rule of nines is sufficient to estimate TBSA. Record carefully the areas involved, including exposure of joints/bones/muscles/tendons, burn depth, and burn patterns.29

Pediatric Burns. Estimating Total Body Surface Area in Children Affected by Burns

Source: By U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – http://www.remm.nlm.gov/burns.htm, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25740802

Patients may meet criteria for admission to a burn unit if they have partial thickness or full thickness burns > 10% (TBSA) and are under the age of 10 years old. Electrical burns, chemical burns, and inhalation injury may also require transfer to a burn center. Primary survey includes airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure/environment, fluids, removing child from source of injury, removing clothing/jewelry, and protecting affected areas with sterile dressings. Children with suspected inhalation injuries (by history, facial burns, singed nose hairs) are at risk for airway compromise up to 48 hours after exposure and early intubation is recommended.23

During the subacute or chronic phases, maturation of scars (immature hypertrophic, linear hypertrophic, minor keloid, major keloid, widespread burn hypertrophic) need to be followed. Close monitoring of current active and passive range of motion at involved and uninvolved joints are important to track symptom progression and therapy progress. Strength, sensation, coordination, balance, and vision should also be assessed. Psychological evaluation aids in establishing a treatment plan.30 Depending on the mechanism of injury, additional physical examination findings should be noted, such as loss of limbs, patterns of paralysis, upper motor neuron signs, and changes to mentation.

Other assessment tools include the following:

  • Burn Injuries in Child Abuse: aids in evaluating cases suspicious for child abuse31
  • FACES Pain Rating Scale: 5 years and older
  • Visual analog pain scale: 12 years and older
  • Scar assessment (e.g., Vancouver Scar Scale)

Functional assessment

There are no specific functional assessment measures for children with burn injuries. The WeeFIM instrument has been utilized to provide data on functional independence in pediatric burn patients but has many limitations.32 This can be used in addition with other ADL or mobility scales, as well as with the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire.33

Assessment tools related to the area of injury can be helpful in monitoring therapeutic progress. Determine developmental appropriateness for gross and fine motor, speech/language, and social milestones based on age.

Laboratory studies

  • Routine studies include Complete Blood Count (CBC), Arterial Blood Gas (ABG), Electrolytes, Prothrombin time (PT), Partial thrombin time (PTT), International Normalized Ratio (INR)
  • Prealbumin and albumin to assess nutritional status
  • Cardiac laboratory studies are not indicative of cardiac injury following electrical burns34


  • Complete skeletal survey when abuse is suspected35
  • Head imaging, such as MRI of the brain, when anoxic/traumatic brain injury is suspected or following electrical injuries
  • Ultrasound in the subacute/chronic phase to more objectively assess scar depth

Supplemental assessment tools

  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) for all electrical injuries (if low-voltage [< 1000 V] injury and normative ECG, child can be discharged safely home, unless other admission criteria are met)34
  • Flexible bronchoscopy to assess severity of inhalational injury and possible need for hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat carboxyhemoglobin poisoning
  • Photography of scars for more objective measure of change over time
  • Consider early consults to otolaryngology if there are concerns for laryngeal edema or ophthalmology if there is concern for erosion or ulceration of the cornea
  • Once admitted, administer IV fluid resuscitation, multivitamins, and tetanus prophylaxis (All patients with abrasion, lacerations, burns, or other wounds require a tetanus immunization history as tetanus occurs almost exclusively in patients with incomplete primary immunization. Prophylaxis provides an opportunity to boost immunity. Unless a booster has been received within the last 5 years, patients should receive prophylaxis.36,37)

Early predictions of outcomes

Outcomes are better if children with any of the following characteristics are treated at a burn center29:

  • More than 20% TBSA partial thickness or more than 10% partial thickness and less than 10 years old
  • TBSA full thickness of 2%
  • Circumferential or involving face, feet, hands, and/or genitalia

The most significant predictors of outcomes are depth of injury and TBSA burned. Children whose burns were secondary to abuse and those with inhalation injury have a poorer prognosis. The younger the child with burn injuries, the better reported quality of life. Better social support predicts better outcomes. Established family relationships play the greatest role in psychological adjustment. It is important to identify early and closely monitor patients with compromised relationships.30

The Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) is a useful tool to measure functional outcomes over time in children following burn injuries (ages 5-18 years).38


Home and school characteristics, including steps and bathroom setup, are important for therapeutic and discharge planning. Early school integration can avoid a sense of isolation. Enlist classmates to make the patient feel comfortable.

Social role and social support system

Assess who will be providing care for the child, support in the community, and family needs for increasing compliance and safety in home. Psychosocial care is important in burn victims, especially in the rehabilitation and reintegration phase of recovery. Patients are at risk to experience symptoms of helplessness, anxiety, guilt, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Many burn victims may struggle to accept their new image of “self”. Psychiatry referrals for medication regimens and psychotherapy can be important for children that suffer from adjustment disorder or PTSD.

After initial stabilization, the burn care team should assess for signs of internalization or low self-esteem. Early identification and treatment can prevent long term sequelae. Family support is important to remind the child they have not been abandoned. The parents of children with burn injuries often suffer from psychological distress as a result of the injury as well. The mental health of the child’s entire support team should be considered and addressed for effective rehabilitation.39Additionally, having a plan for school reintegration as soon as possible to maintain a sense of normalcy and avoid isolation.40

Guidelines for treatment:

  • Treat difficulties during rehabilitation and adaptation as normal experiences that can be overcome – full recovery is possible and may take up to 2 years
  • Incorporate the family group as much as possible in the patient’s treatment but maintain patient autonomy
  • Train for self-efficacy
  • Psychotherapists play a crucial role in psychological rehabilitation and helping the patient define their new self-image41
  • Psychological rehabilitation continues long after physical rehabilitation is completed

Professional issues

Suspected child abuse cases must be reported to the proper authorities for investigation. Burn injuries comprise approximately 10% of child abuse cases. Patients are usually under the age of 10 with most cases occurring in children younger than 2 years old. Suspicions should be raised if there are discrepancies to the story, injuries with clean lines of demarcation, concomitant fractures, delays in seeking medical attention, or contact burns suspicious for household appliances or cigarettes.31

Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

Available or current treatment guidelines

In May 2008, The American Burn Association published consensus positions and future research directions pertaining to Burn Rehabilitation.42Topics include:

  • Administrative Issues and Initiatives
  • Research and Education
  • Documentation
  • Hand Burns
  • Exercise in Burn Patient Management
  • Burn Patient Perioperative Rehabilitation Management
  • Splinting and Casting
  • Edema
  • Positioning
  • Burn Scar
  • Pain/Pruritis
  • Physical Agents to Manage Burn Scar
  • Outcomes of Burn Survivors
  • Head and Neck Burns
  • Critical Care Aspects

At different disease stages

  • Acute: Resuscitation and medical stabilization are required prior to beginning rehabilitation efforts. Burned areas should be positioned to prevent edema and counteract contractile forces. Positioning, range of motion, and custom-molded orthoses are critical in early stages of recovery to reduce edema, maintain range of motion, prevent contractures and stiffness, and prevent muscle shortness.43 If an autograft is performed, there may be restrictions for weight bearing and stretching per the surgeon, typically lasting 4 days.44If a tendon or joint space is involved, a period of immobilization may be required to promote healing. Pain management involves continuous or patient-controlled opioid analgesia. Positioning may be difficult in the very young child. Comfort should not be emphasized when positioning, as positions of comfort may promote contractures.9 Appropriate positioning may be provided with the use of pillows, pads, bolsters, splints, and other equipment. Wearing schedules should be provided. Children who are more mobile may not keep their joints in appropriate splinting and may need provision of ROM more frequently. Sometimes splinting needs to be worn for 24 hours. If this is the case, affected areas should be checked for pressure, nerve compression, or other complications.
  • Subacute: Strengthening, weight bearing, and early ambulation begin once medically stable. Children should be encouraged to participate in age-appropriate activities and therapeutic interventions as soon as medically possible. Early ambulation maintains lower extremity ROM, balance, and decreases risk of deep venous thrombosis. Strengthening focuses on opposition of the contractile forces of scarring and should involve active or active-assist exercises when possible. Circumferential burns require attention to both agonist and antagonist muscle strengthening. Modifications may be required if cardiopulmonary restrictions are present. Orthoses are modified for volume fluctuation, and serial casting is used for contractures greater than 30°.44Pressure garments are a mainstay of therapy, providing resistance to rising forces in hypertrophic scar formation. Recommended use is 23 hours daily, which can lead to compliance issues, especially in children. Scar massage should begin in deep or delayed healing (>21 days) wounds, starting with non-friction techniques and advancing to friction techniques once able to withstand shearing forces. Massage is recommended at least twice daily for 3 to 5 minutes per area and has additional benefits such as decreasing edema and skin hypersensitivity. Aquatic therapy is a useful tool to enhance cardiovascular health and engage large muscle groups in exercise. However, patients with open wounds may have limited access to aquatic interventions until fully healed or small enough to protect.  Long-acting opioids, neuropathic pain modulators (i.e., gabapentin), and premedication for dressing changes assist with pain and pruritus control. Nutritional optimization needs to be continued during this stage.  Distractions, relaxation, and family support are non-pharmacological interventions that can assist with pain management. Additional team members, such as child life specialists and recreational therapists may be essential in integrating additional activities, optimizing participation, assisting with distraction, and providing education at a developmentally appropriate level.
  • Chronic: Resistive exercise programs are essential to increase strength, power, and lean body mass.45Close monitoring is required, particularly during periods of growth, because scars may need revision to maintain joint mobility and function.27 Reconstructive surgery may be appropriate at this stage and rehabilitation interventions may depend on areas to be reconstructed. Laser techniques can be utilized for scar management. Small areas that may not affect function may not require rehabilitation interventions. However, if reconstructive efforts include areas such as joints, head or neck, patients may require a rehabilitation team to assist with maintaining function. Overall, growth is less than age-matched peers for up to 2 years. Effective psychosocial management is critical for long term recovery. Adequate family support has the greatest impact on psychological recovery and adjustment.
  • Special considerations: It is important to identify if there are any concomitant injuries or conditions that may impact the recovery process. For example, patients with burn injuries from motor vehicle accidents may have additional injuries such as traumatic brain injuries or spinal cord injuries. If found, focused therapies should be incorporated in the rehabilitation plan to address these conditions. If amputation is required, careful evaluation of ipsilateral and contralateral limbs and other functional restrictions is necessary. Air bags or orthotic components can assist with weight bearing on sensitive skin or when wounds are healing. Early enteral nutrition is recommended, with emphasis on increased calories and protein. Medications can be used to counteract the catabolic state (i.e., oxandrolone, propranolol).46

Pressure garment therapy

Burn scarring occurs in as much as 70% of burn cases. Prolonged inflammation during the healing process can result in excessive collagen deposition, thus forming scars. Pressure Garment Therapy (PGT) is considered a mainstay of therapy and theorized to manipulate wound repair physically and mechanically. PGT has been shown to be clinically effective but there is minimal literature evidence illustrating the effectiveness of PGT over time.47

PGT shows the most benefits when used during the initial stages of scar formation. However, the majority of patients are often non-adherent with PGT due to prolonged periods of time wearing the garment, poor appearance, discomfort from heat, and restricted movement.

Coordination of care

A multidisciplinary team, including surgeons, pediatricians, physiatrists, therapists, exercise physiologists, child life specialists, dieticians, social workers, and psychologists, provides comprehensive care to children and families. Communication with local providers is essential for transition of care. School coordinators are crucial to help children successfully re-enter school as well.

Patient & family education

Caregivers are instructed in scar massage techniques and skin protection with moisturizer, sunscreen, and sun avoidance. Families are educated in the use of PGT and orthoses, and skin and wound monitoring. A home exercise program is developed with frequent monitoring once discharged from acute hospitalization for maintenance of ROM, continued endurance building and overall optimization of function. Families need to understand burn prevention methods, which have been previously discussed above.

Children with burns have a higher incidence of psychological issues, including behavioral difficulty, enuresis, anxiety, phobias, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Education of peers prior to return to school facilitates social acceptance.School Re-Entry Coordinators may assist with communication among the healthcare team and transitioning back to community and school. This will minimize stress with returning to school and optimize this transition.

Emerging/unique interventions

Traditional rehabilitation remains the gold standard for burn rehabilitation. However, there are emerging techniques and programs that are being developed to supplement and aid rehabilitation.

Following burn injuries, there is an increase in skeletal muscle catabolism and muscle loss. Standardized, resistance exercise programs may help minimize muscle loss and lead to improvements in strength and lean body mass (compared to a rehabilitation program without resistance exercise).45,48Similarly, in patients (aged 10-15 years) with lower extremity TBSA burns (ranging 36-45%), a 12-week isokinetic training program (quadricep focused) showed improvements in quadricep strength, size, and gait parameters compared to controls.45,49

Video games such as the Microsoft Xbox Kinect and Sony PlayStation 3 Move have also been shown to have therapeutic potential in burn rehabilitation. The physical demands of such games are comparable to the functional motions needed for many ADLs.50

Translation into practice: practice “pearls”/performance improvement in practice (PIPs)/changes in clinical practice behaviors and skills

  • Primary care providers can help prevent burn injuries with family education.
  • Scar healing involves contractile forces and rising forces; proper management addresses both.
  • Proper positioning to prevent contracture opposes the position of greatest comfort.
  • Long-term, careful monitoring of psychologic health is essential to promote quality of life.

Cutting Edge/ Emerging and Unique Concepts and Practice

  • Cultured epidermal autografts and cultured skin substitutes need further evaluation to determine efficacy and feasibility of use.51
  • Laser Doppler imaging is being utilized as a more objective measurement of scars and burn depth assessment.52
  • Advances in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery, along with laser scar modulation, has revolutionized burn reconstruction in small infants and children.53
  • In children with significant burns, propranolol can reduce catecholamine-induced hypermetabolic states to prevent excessive proteolysis and lipolysis.54
  • Versajet hydrosugery has emerged as a more precise method of wound debridement but has not been shown to significantly reduce hypertrophic scarring.55
  • Mepilex Ag has been found to accelerate wound re-epithelization time and decrease pain during dressing changes in children with partial-thickness burns when compared to Acticoat and Acticoat with Mepitel dressings.56
  • Virtual reality (VR) is an effective and simple pain distractor during burn rehabilitation, especially for young children. There was an immediate reduction in pain and an increase in ROM when VR was added to the rehabilitation plan for pediatric burn patients.57
  • After thorough review with international stakeholders, a core outcome set for burn care research was developed to standardize and support clinical decision making in global burn care. The outcomes included: 1. Death from the burn or any cause; 2. Prespecified serious complications or adverse events (ie sepsis, wound infection, and thrombotic events; 3. Ability to do daily tasks; 4. Time to wound healing, including that of grafted and donor site wounds; 5. Long-term (after healing) neuropathic pain and itch; 6. Psychological well-being; 7. Time to return to work, school, or previous occupation.58 Future studies in burn care should employ this outcome set.

Gaps in the Evidence-Based Knowledge

  • Although PGT is a mainstay of burn therapy, further research is required to determine long-term efficacy. There has been little new evidence supporting or discouraging the use of PGT (see Pressure Garment Therapy section above).
  • There is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of community-based programs to prevent scalds/burns in children, more quality research in needed.59


  1. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns
  2. American Burn Association. 2019 National Burn Repository Report of Data From 2009-2018.
  3. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns. Fact Sheet Detail Burns. 2019.
  4. https://ameriburn.org/who-we-are/media/burn-incidence-fact-sheet/. Burn Incidence Fact Sheet. 2019.
  5. Rossi R, Alexander M, Eckert K, Cuccurrullo S. Pediatric Rehabilitation: Pediatric Burns. In: Cuccurrullo S, ed. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Review. 4th ed. DemosMedical; 2020:763-766.
  6. Burn Injuries in Child Abuse – Office of Justice Programs.
  7. Chen G, Smith GA, Ranbom L, Sinclair SA, Xiang H. Incidence and pattern of burn injuries among children with disabilities. J Trauma – Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62(3). doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000203760.47151.28
  8. Lee CJ, Mahendraraj K, Houng A, et al. Pediatric burns: A single institution retrospective review of incidence, etiology, and outcomes in 2273 burn patients (1995-2013). J Burn Care Res. 2016;37(6). doi:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000362
  9. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Prevention and Control.
  10. Yakupu A, Zhang J, Dong W, Song F, Dong J, Lu S. The epidemiological characteristic and trends of burns globally. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1-16. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13887-2
  11. https://ameriburn.org/advocacy-and-prevention/prevention-resources/. American Burn Association. Prevention.
  12. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/burns/burns-in-children. Burns in Children.
  13. Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulski P. Pathophysiology and types of burns. BMJ. 2004;328(7453). doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1427
  14. Arturson G. Pathophysiology of the burn wound. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1980;69(5).
  15. Gabriel V, Holavanahalli R. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Burn rehabilitation. In: Braddom RL, ed. 4th ed. ; 2007:1403-1418.
  16. Warby R, Maani C. Burn Classification. StatPearls. Published online 2022.
  17. Warner PM, Coffee TL, Yowler CJ. Outpatient burn management. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(4). doi:10.1016/j.suc.2014.05.009
  18. www.ameriburn.org. American Burn Association White Paper. Surgical management of the burn wound and use of skin substitutes.
  19. Tolles J. Emergency department management of patients with thermal burns. Emerg Med Pract. 2018;20(2).
  20. Evers LH, Bhavsar D, Mailänder P. The biology of burn injury. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(9). doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01105.x
  21. Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, Chung KK, Gibran NS, Logsetty S. Burn injury. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2020;6(1). doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5
  22. Griffin BR, Frear CC, Babl F, Oakley E, Kimble RM. Cool Running Water First Aid Decreases Skin Grafting Requirements in Pediatric Burns: A Cohort Study of Two Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-five Children. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(1). doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.06.028
  23. Herndon DN, Hart DW, Wolf SE, Chinkes DL, Wolfe RR. Reversal of Catabolism by Beta-Blockade after Severe Burns. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(17). doi:10.1056/nejmoa010342
  24. Lee J, Herndon D. The pediatric burned patient. In: Total Burn Care. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2007:485-495.
  25. Singerman J, Gomez M, Fish JS. Long-term sequelae of low- voltage electrical injury. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(5). doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e318184815d
  26. Schneider JC, Nadler DL, Herndon DN, et al. Pruritus in pediatric burn survivors: Defining the clinical course. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36(1). doi:10.1097/BCR.0000000000000145
  27. Davoodi P, Fernandez JM, Seung-Jun O. Postburn sequelae in the pediatric patient: Clinical presentations and treatment options. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(4). doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318175f4df
  28. Alharbi Z, Piatkowski A, Dembinski R, et al. Treatment of burns in the first 24 hours: simple and practical guide by answering 10 questions in a step-by-step form. World J Emerg Surg. 2012;7(1). doi:10.1186/1749-7922-7-13
  29. Whateley Driscoll S, Kowalske K. Burns. In: Murphy K, McMahon M, Houtrow A, eds. Pediatric Rehabilitation Principles and Practice. 6th ed. DemosMedical; 2021:553-561.
  30. Landolt MA, Grubenmann S, Meuli M. Family impact greatest: Predictors of quality of life and psychological adjustment in pediatric burn survivors. J Trauma – Inj Infect Crit Care. 2002;53(6). doi:10.1097/00005373-200212000-00019
  31. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/91190-6.pdf. U.S. Department of Justice. Burn Injuries in Child Abuse.
  32. Disseldorp LM, Niemeijer AS, Van Baar ME, Reinders-Messelink HA, Mouton LJ, Nieuwenhuis MK. How disabling are pediatric burns? Functional independence in Dutch pediatric patients with burns. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(1). doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.012
  33. Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Phillips CB, et al. American burn association/shriners hospitals for children burn outcomes questionnaire: Construction and psychometric properties. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000;21(1). doi:10.1097/00004630-200021010-00007
  34. Arnoldo B, Klein M, Gibran NS. Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(4). doi:10.1097/01.BCR.0000226250.26567.4C
  35. Toon MH, Maybauer DM, Arceneaux LL, et al. Children with burn injuries-assessment of trauma, neglect, violence and abuse. J Inj Violence Res. 2011;3(2). doi:10.5249/jivr.v3i2.91
  36. Trott A. Tetanus Immunity and Antibiotic Wound Prophylaxis. In: Wounds and Lacerations: Emergency Care and Closure. 4th ed. ; 2012.
  37. Pan B. Burn Care. In: Stehr W, ed. The Mont Reid Surgical Handbook. 6th ed. ; 2008.
  38. Sveen J, Huss F, Sjöberg F, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the swedish version of the burn outcomes questionnaire for children aged 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33(6). doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182331aaa
  39. Xi MM, Lei F, Xie WG. [Advances in the research of psychological rehabilitation of pediatric burn  patients]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020;36(6).
  40. Nguyen TJ, Thaller S. Psychological Rehabilitation of Pediatric Burn Patients.
  41. Blakeney PE, Rosenberg L, Rosenberg M, Faber AW. Psychosocial care of persons with severe burns. Burns. 2008;34(4). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2007.08.008
  42. Richard R, Baryza MJ, Carr JA, et al. Burn rehabilitation and research: Proceedings of a consensus summit. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30(4). doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181adcd93
  43. Ohgi S, Gu S. Pediatric burn rehabilitation: Philosophy and strategies. Burn Trauma. 2013;1(2). doi:10.4103/2321-3868.118930
  44. Serghiou MA, Ott S, Whitehead C, Cowan A, McEntire S, Suman OE. Comprehensive rehabilitation of the burn patient. In: Total Burn Care: Fourth Edition. ; 2012. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4377-2786-9.00047-3
  45. Suman OE, Spies RJ, Celis MM, Mlcak RP, Herndon DN. Effects of a 12-wk resistance exercise program on skeletal muscle strength in children with burn injuries. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91(3). doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.3.1168
  46. Herndon DN, Tompkins RG. Support of the metabolic response to burn injury. Lancet. 2004;363(9424). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16360-5
  47. Lu J, Xu T, Liu Y, Yang M, Jiang X. Pressure garment therapy for preventing hypertrophic and keloid scarring after a major burn injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011543.pub2
  48. Al-Mousawi AM, Williams FN, Mlcak RP, Jeschke MG, Herndon DN, Suman OE. Effects of exercise training on resting energy expenditure and lean mass during pediatric burn rehabilitation. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(3). doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db5317
  49. Ebid AA, El-Shamy SM, Draz AH. Effect of isokinetic training on muscle strength, size and gait after healed pediatric burn: A randomized controlled study. Burns. 2014;40(1). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.022
  50. Parry I, Carbullido C, Kawada J, et al. Keeping up with video game technology: Objective analysis of Xbox KinectTM and PlayStation 3 MoveTM for use in burn rehabilitation. Burns. 2014;40(5). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2013.11.005
  51. Barret JP, Wolf SE, Desai MH, Herndon DN. Cost-efficacy of cultured epidermal autografts in massive pediatric burns. Ann Surg. 2000;231(6). doi:10.1097/00000658-200006000-00011
  52. Shin JY, Yi HS. Diagnostic accuracy of laser Doppler imaging in burn depth assessment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2016;42(7). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.012
  53. Fisher M. Pediatric Burn Reconstruction: Focus on Evidence. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44(4). doi:10.1016/j.cps.2017.05.018
  54. Finnerty CC, Herndon DN. Is propranolol of benefit in pediatric burn patients? Adv Surg. 2013;47(1). doi:10.1016/j.yasu.2013.02.001
  55. Hyland EJ, D’Cruz R, Menon S, et al. Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing VersajetTM hydrosurgery and conventional debridement of partial thickness paediatric burns. Burns. 2015;41(4). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.001
  56. Gee Kee EL, Kimble RM, Cuttle L, Khan A, Stockton KA. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns. 2015;41(5). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2014.11.005
  57. Ali RR, Selim AO, Abdel Ghafar MA, Abdelraouf OR, Ali OI. Virtual reality as a pain distractor during physical rehabilitation in pediatric burns. Burns. 2022;48(2). doi:10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.031
  58. Young A, Davies A, Tsang C, et al. Establishment of a core outcome set for burn care research: development and international consensus. BMJ Med. 2022;1(1):e000183. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000183
  59. Turner C, Spinks A, McClure RJ, Nixon J. Community-based interventions for the prevention of burns and scalds in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online 2004. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004335.pub2

Original Version of the Topic

Kimberly C. Hartman, MD, Jason Kiene, MD. Pediatric Burns. 9/20/2014

Previous Revision(s) of the Topic

Glendaliz Bosques, MD, Mani Singh, MD. Pediatric Burns. 9/3/2019

Author Disclosure

Joslyn Gober, DO
Nothing to Disclose

Alyssa Zlatkin
Nothing to Disclose