Jump to:

Disease/ Disorder


Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) of at least 20 mm Hg or a reduction in diastolic BP of at least 10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of standing or head-up tilting to 60 degrees.1 A smaller drop in blood pressure may be equally important when associated with relevant symptoms that indicate impaired perfusion. OH following spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and well-documented, most often seen with complete lesions above neurological level T6 and most severe during the acute phase.2,3


SCI may cause dysregulation in the autonomic nervous system and associated reflexes. The prevalence of OH as well as the degree of the fall in blood pressure is higher with cervical than with thoracic SCI. Low plasma volume, hyponatremia, and cardiovascular deconditioning may be additional contributing factors in some instances.3

Epidemiology including risk factors and primary prevention

OH has been reported to be more common after traumatic than nontraumatic SCI. Prevalence in acute SCI has been reported to be as high as 74% and occurs more frequently with tetraplegia than paraplegia.3,4 Symptoms are less likely to occur in SCI below the origin of the major splanchnic outflow at T6 and with incomplete injuries.


The major underlying abnormality in SCI-related OH is due to sympathetic interruption. The lack of sympathetically mediated reflex vasoconstriction, especially in large vascular beds, such as those supplying the splanchnic region and skeletal muscle result in an inability to compensate for changes in posture.3,5 The gravitational effect of venous pooling in the lower extremities is accompanied by a lack of compensatory changes in other vascular beds, leading to a fall in blood pressure. Venous pooling results in reduced filling pressure at the heart, and a decrease in the end-diastolic filling volume and stroke volume. Tachycardia may occur due to reflex vagal inhibition but is not sufficient to compensate for the reduced sympathetic response.

Disease progression including natural history, disease phases or stages, disease trajectory (clinical features and presentation over time)

OH subsequent to SCI often, but not always, improves over time.2,3,5 Compensatory changes in other vascular beds may contribute to blood pressure homeostasis. Reduced blood flow to the kidneys may activate afferent glomerular dilatation and result in the stimulation of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system. Other potential mechanisms for improvement over time include vascular wall receptor hypersensitivity, some recovery of postural reflexes at the spinal level, and increased skeletal muscle tone. Tolerance to symptoms of OH often develops over time even with continued evidence of postural reduction in blood pressure in the upright position. It has been suggested that autoregulation of cerebral blood flow, rather than systemic blood pressure, may play a dominant role in the adaptation to OH.6 In the acute stage, OH is a result of losing vasomotor tone coupled with venous pooling in the peripheral and splanchnic vasculature. In the chronic stage, OH is due to the reduction/loss of sympathetic activity below the level of the injury. Muscle atrophy below the level of the lesion also contributes to venous pooling in the lower extremity.7,8

Specific secondary or associated conditions and complications

Postural hypotension may be influenced by several factors, many of which are reversible.2,3 These include rapid changes in position and prolonged recumbency. Hypotension may be worse in the morning on rising. Heavy meals may exacerbate a fall in blood pressure (and contribute postprandial hypotension) in response to shunting of blood to the splanchnic circulation after a meal.4,9 Physical exertion, alcohol intake, or a hot environment can precipitate hypotension by promoting vasodilatation. Sepsis and dehydration can worsen symptoms. Several medications can induce or worsen OH, including the following common medications: tricyclic antidepressants, antihypertensives, diuretics, narcotic analgesics, and some muscle relaxants like tizanidine.4 Deconditioning after prolonged bedrest exacerbates OH. The late development or worsening of OH months or years after injury may be a sign of posttraumatic syringomyelia.

Essentials of Assessment


Many of the symptoms of OH occur as a result of cerebral hypoperfusion.10 These include dizziness, light-headedness, loss of consciousness, impaired concentration, and visual disturbances such as blurred vision, scotoma, tunnel vision, or color defects. Pallor or auditory deficits may also occur. Sometimes symptoms may be nonspecific, for example generalized weakness, lethargy, or nausea. A suboccipital/paracervical headache (aka “coat hanger headache”) may be a manifestation of hypoperfusion of continuously active paracervical muscles. Excess sweating may occur above the level of injury. The presence of secondary or associated factors mentioned above that could be precipitating or worsening to OH should be assessed during history taking.

Physical examination

Blood pressure should be measured when the patient is in the supine position and at least 3 minutes after assuming the upright position.1

Functional assessment

OH may hinder functional assessment and participation in rehabilitation therapies because of the occurrence of symptoms with sitting up or standing. This can result in missed therapy sessions and also play a role in patient safety and falls.

Laboratory studies

Laboratory testing is primarily focused on ruling out non-neurologic causes of OH (e.g., blood loss, dehydration, sepsis, or endocrine disorders) and often includes a complete blood count, electrolyte assessment, and blood glucose level.  While not routinely needed, additional testing, such as a morning cortisol level to check for adrenocortical insufficiency, may be indicated if the diagnosis is unclear or if specific disorders are suspected.10  


Late occurrence or worsening of OH should prompt suspicion of posttraumatic syringomyelia, and appropriate diagnostic imaging such as spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated.

Supplemental assessment tools

Autonomic testing may be done in specialized centers,10 but its role in SCI-related neurogenic OH is not established. Examples include testing heart rate variability with deep breathing and during Valsalva maneuver, and a head-up tilt table test as a tool for evaluation of orthostatic stress.

Early predictions of outcomes

Frequency and severity of symptoms, time upright before onset of symptoms, influence on activities of daily living, and blood pressure can provide an indication of the severity of OH or response to treatment.11 Those with incomplete or thoracic injuries are more likely to resolve rapidly, though symptoms improve in most cases irrespective of level and completeness of injury.

Social role and social support system

Severe, protracted OH can limit time in a wheelchair and curtail community participation with a negative impact on quality of life.

Professional Issues

Reassurance about the typical time course of SCI-related OH with improvement in symptoms after the acute phase is helpful to patients and caregivers who are struggling with OH.

Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

At different disease stages

No single treatment for OH in SCI is consistently effective. Success may be increased by combining and individualizing management.3,10,11

A number of practical nonpharmacologic measures can be taken to minimize the hypotensive effects, although evidence of effectiveness in SCI is limited for some.3,10 Small, frequent meals may minimize postprandial symptoms, as well as limiting alcohol intake with meals. Patients may have greater functional capacity before a meal than in the hour following it and may be able to adjust their activities accordingly. If blood pressure is higher later in the day, physical exertion, such as exercise programs or physical therapy, may be better tolerated in the afternoon rather than the early morning. The nocturnal diuresis that sometimes occurs in SCI may lead to inadequate blood volume. Elevating the head of the bed by 5-10 (reverse Trendelenburg position) may reduce nocturnal diuresis, morning postural hypotension, hypovolemia, and supine hypertension, although patients may not be able to tolerate more than a few degrees of head-up tilt during the night. Rapid changes in position should be avoided, as should excessive exertion in hot environments. A review of patient medications is essential, and modification may be indicated to minimize hypotensive side effects. Administering vasoactive medications with meals may be particularly disabling. Liberalizing salt and water intake may improve blood volume, although the benefit of salt loading has not been sufficiently proven in people with SCI. Abdominal binders and compressive stockings may be used in an attempt to reduce venous pooling through decreased capacitance of leg and abdominal vascular beds. However, donning these may present practical problems for people with SCI and there is conflicting evidence of effectiveness. Repeated and gradual increase in postural challenges, such as with the use of a tilt-table, may be useful in the acute stages. A tilt-in-space or reclining wheelchair is beneficial for accommodating a progressive increase in the sitting angle and also allows reclining in response to symptoms.

Evidence for use of body weight-supported treadmill training to improve orthostatic tolerance is currently insufficient. There is some evidence to support using functional electrical stimulation (FES) in the treatment of OH in SCI.3 FES-induced contraction of leg muscles may increase venous return, cardiac output, and stroke volume that can increase blood pressure and decrease hypotension-related symptoms, and the response appears to be dose dependent and independent of the site of stimulation.  However, the time needed for sessions during inpatient rehabilitation seems to limit feasibility in the subacute post-injury period.12 Biofeedback also has some supporting evidence as an intervention for OH in SCI, but clinical usefulness has yet to be proven.13

Pharmacologic Management

Several drugs have been used to treat OH, though effectiveness varies.8,10 The drugs for which there has been the most experience in use for SCI-related OH include fludrocortisone and midodrine (Table 1).3,14 Only midodrine and droxidopa are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of neurogenic OH.8,11,14

Table 1. Pharmacological Agents used in the Treatment of OH in SCI15-17

a Only midodrine and droxidopa are FDA-approved for the indication of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.10

Coordination of care

Activities requiring exertion in the upright position should not be scheduled first thing in the morning when orthostatic tolerance is lowest or right after meals; therefore, a therapy schedule may need to be adjusted accordingly.

Patient & family education

Counseling, about avoidance of exacerbating factors and measures that patients and caregivers can take, is helpful. For example, patients should be advised to move from a supine to upright position gradually, especially in the morning and to avoid exertion in hot weather.  It can be helpful to remind patients to wait 30 seconds after sitting up to assume upright positioning.

Emerging/unique interventions

The goal of treatment is to alleviate the disability caused by symptoms, rather than to achieve an optimal target blood pressure reading. Ensuring patient safety should continue to be a priority while optimizing the patient so that they can carry out the prescribed therapy.

Translation into practice: practice “pearls”/performance improvement in practice (PIPs)/changes in clinical practice behaviors and skills

Patients with coexisting OH and supine hypertension are especially challenging to manage and require careful titration and trial of medications.8,11 Short-acting antihypertensive agents at night, for example a nitroglycerin patch, may help control nocturnal hypertension without exacerbating daytime OH. Raising the head end of the bed may also mitigate nocturnal supine hypertension.

Cutting Edge/ Emerging and Unique Concepts and Practice

Cutting edge concepts and practice

Droxidopa, a synthetic amino acid precursor of epinephrine, already has FDA approval for treating OH, and is being studied for use in SCI-related OH.4,16 A study in 2017 in Spain found that droxidopa at 300 mg BID dosing increased BP levels and improved patient symptoms and may be appropriate option to consider in cases refractory to physical and pharmacologic interventions.17 A study with data from a VA Hospital showed that 400 mg dosing of droxidopa did not cause excessive increases in supine BP and was effective at increasing seated BP for up to 3 hours in SCI patients.18 Additional studies are underway to evaluate dosing protocols for droxidopa. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, atomoxetine, is also being studied, with one randomized controlled-trial showing atomoxetine to be more effective than midodrine but is not currently FDA-approved for the treatment of OH.14,19

Spinal cord epidural stimulation for the treatment of autonomic dysfunction in SCI is another emerging area of research, with the goal of using lumbosacral epidural stimulation to acutely attenuate hypotension.20  After establishment of a preclinical model, experiments in one patient with OH due to a chronic, complete cervical SCI have been recently described, using an implantable neuroprosthesis that applied epidural electrical stimulation (EES) over the lower thoracic spinal cord.21 Hemodynamic stabilization during orthostatic challenges on a tilt-table was demonstrated with concomitant increased sympathetic nerve activity and circulating levels of noradrenaline during the head-up tilt.  Daily use of this therapy was associated with reduced self-reported burden of OH for this patient and enabled him to cease other treatments for OH.21   Further clinical trials are anticipated to study the safety and efficacy of this intervention.

Gaps in the Evidence-Based Knowledge

Given the lack of consistently effective treatment, current emerging therapies need to be further examined and newer therapies need to be developed. Well-designed controlled studies for current treatments still remain limited.3 Newer medications which show promising initial results such as droxidopa and atomoxetine also require extensive studies over the long term.


  1. Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, Benditt DG, Benarroch E, Biaggioni I, et al. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neutrally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Auton Res 2011:21(2):69-72.
  2. Nobunaga AI. Orthostatic hypotension in spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1997;4:73-80.
  3. Krassioukov A, Warburton DER, Teasell RW, Eng JJ. Orthostatic hypotension following spinal cord injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AG, Aubut J, Abramson C, Hsieh JTC, Connolly, S, eds. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Vancouver, Canada: SCIRE Project; 2006:16.1-16.7.
  4. Palma JA, Kaufmann H. Management of Orthostatic Hypotension. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Feb;26(1):154-177.
  5. Teasell RW, Arnold MO, Krassioukov A, et al. Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:506-516.
  6. Gonzalez F, Chang JY, Banovac K, et al. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in patients with orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991;29:1-7.
  7. Philips AA, Krassioukov AV. Contemporary Cardiovascular Concerns after Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms, Maladaptations, and Management. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1927-42.
  8. Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Warburton DE, Teasell R. A system review of the management of orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Arch Phy Med Rehabil. 2009 May:90(5):876-85.
  9. Shibao C, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, Dossett C, Choi L, Farley G, Biaggioni I. Acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, attenuates postprandial hypotension in autonomic failure. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):54-61.
  10. Freeman R. Clinical practice. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:615-24.
  11. Low PA, Singer W. Management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: an update. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:451-458.
  12. Moineau B, Brown A, Brisbois L, Zivanovic V, Miyatani M, Kapadia N, Hsieh JTC, Popovic MR. Lessons learned from the pilot study of an orthostatic hypotension intervention in the subacute phase following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):176-185.
  13. Gillis DJ, Wouda M, Hjeltnes N. Non-pharmacological management of orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2008 Oct;46(10):652-9.
  14. Hale GM, Valdes J, Brenner M. A review of the Treatment of primary Orthostatic Hypotension. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2017 May;51(5):417-428.
  15. Groomes TE, Huang CT. Orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury: treatment with fludrocortisone and ergotamine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:56-58.
  16. Kaufmann H. L-dihydroxyphenylserine (Droxidopa): a new therapy for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: the US experience. Clin Auton Res. 2008;18 Suppl 1:19-24.
  17. Canosa-Hermida E, Mondelo-Garcia C, et al. Refractory orthostatic hypotension in a patient with spinal cord injury: Treatment with droxidopa. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Jan 24:1-4
  18. Wecht JM, Rosado-Rivera D, Weir JP, Ivan A, Yen C, Bauman WA. Hemodynamic effects of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (Droxidopa) in hypotensive individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct:94(10):2006-12.
  19. Byun JI, Kim DY, Moon J, Shin HR, Sunwoo JS, Lee WJ, Lee HS, Park KI, Lee ST, Jung KH, Jung KY, Kim M, Lee SK, Chu K. Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Jan;7(1):112-120.
  20. Sarafis ZK, Monga AK, Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Is Technology for Orthostatic Hypotension Ready for Primetime? PM R. 2018 Sep;10(9 Suppl 2):S249-S263. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.04.011. PMID: 30269810.
  21. Squair JW, Gautier M, Mahe L, et al. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):308-314. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03180-w. Epub 2021 Jan 27. PMID: 33505019.


Sabharwal S. Orthostatic Hypotension. In: Sabharwal S, ed. Essentials of Spinal Cord Medicine. New York, NY: Demos Publishing; 2014:257-262.

Original Version of the Topic

Sunil Sabharwal, MD. Orthostatic Hypotension in SCI. 7/20/2012

Previous Revision(s) of the Topic

Vincent Huang, MD, Raman Sharma, MD, Sunil Sabharwal, MD. Orthostatic Hypotension in SCI. 11/29/2017

Author Disclosure

Rafer Willenberg, MD, PhD
Nothing to Disclose

Jaimie John, MD
Nothing to Disclose

Sunil Sabharwal, MD
Nothing to Disclose